Pollen-Allergies, CO2, & Global Warming
The benefits of added organic matter to the soil have
long been known and are usually attributed to increased nitrogen,
greater water-holding capacity and an increase in activity of soil
earthworms and microbes. But experiments have shown that the
increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) release that accompanies added
organic matter is certainly one of the main reasons why adding
organic matter to the soil increases plant growth.
Greenhouse owners have long understood that plants
consume CO2 and release oxygen. In a greenhouse packed full of
plants, through the process of photosynthesis, the plants can
quickly use up most of the available CO2 and then their growth slows
down or stops. To compensate for this, old time growers used to
place boxes or flats of fresh manure underneath their greenhouse
benches. As the manure decomposed it released CO2 into the
greenhouse air and the plants grew faster as a result.
In today’s modern greenhouses, especially those
with concrete floors, lack of CO2 is always a concern. Most of the
newer greenhouse ranges are now equipped with automatic CO2
regulators that monitor the amount of CO2 in the air inside the
greenhouse and then release more as needed.
In these greenhouses with their gas growth CO2 generators the plants
don’t just grow bigger-- they also mature earlier.
So, what has all this to do with global warming and allergies?
As we become more and more reliant on burning petroleum products and
as our global temperatures continue to rise, carbon dioxide levels
in our air are rising. Before the last election we in the US had
assumed, incorrectly, that no matter which candidate won the
election, new controls were going to be placed on CO2 emissions.
We know better now.
The US with its huge consumption of fossil fuels, (the U.S. produces
nearly 25 percent of man-made carbon dioxide emissions worldwide).
also is experiencing the greatest increase in CO2. Actually, CO2
accounts for 80-85 percent of the heat trapping (greenhouse) gases
contributing to global warming.
The idea that is now called the “Greening Theory” holds that all
this extra CO2 is good. It will result in increased plant growth and
thus in resulting increases in food supplies. There is some merit to
this theory but there are numerous downsides too.
Pollen-Allergies
There are many negative effects from global warming but let’s just
consider one here, pollen production and it’s affect on allergies.
Since 1959 allergies have dramatically increased in the US from 2 to
5 percent of the population affected, to a whopping 38 percent now.
Largely because of the huge horticultural “success” of the much
over-simplified theory of “litter-free” landscaping we already have
vast urban landscapes that are heavily loaded with wind-pollinated
dioecious male cultivars (clones) of trees and shrubs. These modern
landscape trees result in surrounding air with unnaturally large
amounts of allergenic pollen. Because the “messy” urban female trees
are now so rare, almost none of this pollen is now trapped, removed
from the air and turned into seed. (Female trees produce no pollen,
ever, but they do make seeds, pods, and fruit.)
|
We have tidy sidewalks but pollen-filled air.
Under normal carbon dioxide levels these male cloned trees will
always produce abundant amounts of pollen. Under increased levels of
carbon dioxide, they produce considerably more. The increase in
temperature itself also results in increased pollen production, and
in pollen production that starts earlier in the spring and lasts
further into the fall. There is research that shows that under
stress conditions male plants are able to take up more water than
are females. Under stress conditions, such as drought, male trees
are also able to hold onto the water they already have better than
are female plants.
Where there are abundant water and soil nutrient sources the
increases in carbon dioxide levels in our air will result in larger
urban trees, which if they’re allergy trees, will be capable of
producing ever more pollen.
Increases in carbon dioxide increase plant growth but only if there
is enough available extra water and nitrogen in the soil to support
this additional growth. When the supplies of water and nutrients are
not adequate to support this added CO2-induced growth interesting
physiological things happen in plants. Foremost, it is an added
stress on the plants and stress often results in an increase in
unusual reproduction factors.
A stressed lemon tree, for example, will often produce a huge crop
of tiny, very seedy lemons. This is simply the lemon tree’s way of
preparing for it’s own imminent demise and also it’s own legacy of
possible seedlings.
|
 |
Don’t continue to suffer just because you aren’t sure
if your symptoms are allergic or just a seasonal cold.
With
our money back guarantee you have nothing to lose and everything to
gain!
|
|
Another stress example: In daily pollen collections taken by biology
professor Dr. Lee Parker and his students from the top of the Fisher
Science Building at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, California, taken
during the middle of a severe seven year drought, all-time record
oak pollen count levels were recorded.
In the past twenty years in particular there has been a huge
increase in this planting of male cloned street trees. These trees
can not produce pollen until they mature but with the increases in
CO2 levels, we can predict that they will mature earlier than
expected.
Shannon L. LaDeau, a researcher at Duke University found that pine
trees grown with elevated levels of CO2 produced three times the
normal amount of seeds and also matured prematurely.
Lewis H Ziska, Ph.D., a USDA researcher, recently found that
increased CO2 resulted in huge increases in the pollen production of
ragweed and other weeds.
David Karowe, a researcher at the University of Michigan, found
another interesting factor about increased CO2 levels and plants:
their leaves contain fewer nutrients than normal.
Nancy Tuchman, biology professor at Loyola University in Chicago, is
also researching the feed value of CO2 enhanced leaves on
microorganisms and insects. She found that they all grow slower when
fed these “enhanced” leaves. “If all the plants are altered on a
global level, then it’s certainly going to affect all the organisms
on Earth,” she said. “No one is going to escape.”
Compounding all of this is that excessive burning of fossil fuels
and the resulting pollution may well be compromising our very
endocrine and immune systems. Theo Colburn explored this well in the
very interesting book, “Our Stolen Future.”
Great increases in the already excessively high rates of urban
pollen, combined with further compromised immune systems, may well
be the recipe for allergies of true epidemic proportions in the not
too distant future.
Dr. Robert C. Stebbins, renowned biologist from UC Berkeley, told me
recently in a phone conversation, that the planting of all these
cloned male dioecious and compromised monoecious trees, “is a
classic example of how they just didn’t think about the ecology
involved.”
If we don’t start paying closer attention to how we landscape our
cities, and we don’t start getting serious about alternative clean
energy sources, rampant allergies and other pollen-related illnesses
may well be the end result.
This article first appeared in New Scientist Magazine, in London.
About the Author
Thomas Ogren is the author of Allergy-Free Gardening, Ten Speed
Press. Tom does consulting work on landscape and allergies for the
USDA, county asthma coalitions, and the Canadian and American Lung
Associations. He has appeared on HGTV and The Discovery Channel. His
book, Safe Sex in the Garden, was published in 2003. In 2004 Time
Warner Books published his latest book: What the Experts May NOT
Tell You About: Growing the Perfect Lawn. His website:
www.allergyfree-gardening.com
|