Avoiding Allergies by Use of the Right
Native Plants in the Landscape
Many of our most allergenic plants commonly used
in landscaping in the United States and Canada are indeed natives.
However, it is the manipulation of these plants by commercial
horticulture that has, and is, causing most of the huge increases we
are now experiencing with allergy problems.
Thirty years ago fewer than 10 percent of Americans had allergies.
The official figure today is that a whopping 38 percent of us now
suffer from allergies.
Not too many years ago death from asthma was fairly rare. Today it
is all too common and is considered epidemic. Asthma has now become
the number one chronic childhood disease in America.
Furthermore, there is new data coming in recently that shows a
strong connection between over-exposure to pollen and or mold spores
and increases in other diseases such as heart disease, autism,
pneumonia, and reflux disease.
American Elms
The landscape tree in most of America for many years was the tall,
stately American Elm. The American Elm used to grace the streets of
thousands of towns and cities and when DED, Dutch Elm Disease,
started to spread and kill off these native elms, the
insect-pollinated, perfect-flowered elms were most often replaced
with wind-pollinated, unisexual-flowered, street trees.
Many things happened because of the big switch from the elms to
these other tree species. First, the elm flowers had a rich nectar
source and since these trees bloomed very early in the season, at a
time when insect food sources were severely limited urban honeybees
and butterflies depended on this food source.
Since the majority of the street trees used to replace the elms were
wind-pollinated, they often lacked these nectaries and supplied no
early-season food source. Soon we started to see a rapid decline in
the total numbers of urban honeybees and butterflies. There were
other factors as well behind this decline, pollution, insecticides,
and disease, but the loss of the crucial early-season food sources
should not be underestimated.
DED spread mostly from East to West across the US and so has the
rise in allergy rates. You can actually track the spread of allergy
from the decline of the elms.
The American Elms, Ulmus americana, did cause a certain amount of
low-level, early spring allergy, simply because they were so very
common. The over-planting of elms resulted in a lack of biodiversity
and set the stage for the massive kill from the DED. We now know
that it is always a mistake to use a monoculture, to plant too much
of just one species. Diversity is always a good idea in
horticulture.
|
 |
Don’t continue to suffer just because you aren’t sure
if your symptoms are allergic or just a seasonal cold.
With
our money back guarantee you have nothing to lose and everything to
gain!
|
|
Diversity
Biodiversity is the way to go when we are creating landscapes that
will limit allergenic exposure. Almost any species of plants can
eventually cause allergies if it is over-planted enough. All to
often in our urban landscapes of today we see that landscapers have
used the same old plants over and over again. This overly simplistic
approach to landscaping results in landscapes that lack originality
and produce a numbing “sameness” to far too much of our urbanscape.
When residential houses are professionally landscaped with the exact
same plant materials used to landscape banks, real estate offices,
and dentist’s shops, we all lose.
Allergy rates today are far worse in urban areas than they are out
in the country. Pollen allergies are worse in cities than in the
country, despite the fact that there is much more total green matter
in the countryside than in the city. Plant selection has been the
main problem.
Natives and Urban Landscapes
There are many native trees and shrubs used in our landscapes.
Maples, oaks, locust, poplars, willows, catalpa, birch, junipers,
and many more native species are extensively used. Unfortunately the
plant breeders and propagators discovered how to “sex-out” the trees
and shrubs. They learned to use only male plants, ironically, as
“mother plants,” as the source for their scion wood for asexual
propagation. First they just used male plants from the dioecious
(separate-sexed) species, but later they learned how to produce
all-male clones from species that in Nature were never unisexual
(the monoecious species).
For example, Honey Locust trees, (Gleditsia triacanthos) are native
to our Southeastern US. Look at these trees in the wild and you will
see that all of them are almost always covered with long seedpods.
But go to a nursery now and look at the Honey Locust trees for sale.
The ones on sale now are called “seedless” and they are in effect,
all-male clones.
What exactly is the effect of using all male cloned trees and shrubs
in our landscapes? Very simply, this translates to an excess of
allergenic pollen. Only male flowers produce this airborne pollen.
Unisexual female flowers produce no pollen.
Why the Emphasis on Male Plants?
Horticulturists knew that female plants produced seeds, seedpods,
and fruit. This “litter” fell on the sidewalks and created a “mess.”
By using only asexually (no sex involved) propagated cultivars
(cultivated varieties), they were able to create “litter-free”
landscapes. These required less maintenance and were (and still are)
very popular with city arborists and the public. In the US today,
four of five of the top-selling street tree cultivars are male
clones.
Female flowers (pistillate) on female trees or shrubs produce an
electrical (-) current. Their stigmas are broad and sticky. Airborne
pollen from male plants has a negative electrical impulse before
release and a positive charge after release, and this pollen is
light and dry. Because of the + and – electrical charges the pollen
and the stigmas are drawn to each other. They are mutually
attractive. Mother Nature saw to it that pollen would land, and
stick, exactly where it was needed. Female plants are nature’s
pollen traps, our natural air-cleaners.
Today though, most of the female plants are long gone from our
landscapes. The pollen from the males floats about, seeking a moist,
sticky, positive-charged target. We humans emit a positive
electrical charge, and our mucus membranes, our eyes, skin and
especially the linings of our nose and throat, now trap this wayward
pollen. We have become the targets Allergy develops from repeated
over-exposure to the same allergens. If your own yard is full of
pollen-pumping trees and shrubs, you and your family are the ones
who will be exposed the most.
About the Author
Thomas Ogren is the author of Allergy-Free Gardening, Ten Speed
Press. Tom does consulting work on landscape and allergies for the
USDA, county asthma coalitions, and the Canadian and American Lung
Associations. He has appeared on HGTV and The Discovery Channel. His
book, Safe Sex in the Garden, was published in 2003. In 2004 Time
Warner Books published his latest book: What the Experts May NOT
Tell You About: Growing the Perfect Lawn. His website:
www.allergyfree-gardening.com
|